摘要： 以宪法为基础的法律秩序是一个动态的规范体系，上下位阶规范之间具有紧密的意义关联。宪法当然是解释下位阶法律的基础与界限，但法律也可对宪法规范含义的确定产生积极影响。“入户抢劫”的刑法规范是国家履行对住宅自由保护义务的体现，最高人民法院对“户”的司法解释因此也是对住宅自由之规范领域的界定。我国刑法上的“户”在实践中有着两种不同的解释，即“供他人生活”的场所，或者“供他人家庭生活”的场所。面对着这两种不同的解释，解释者应当选择更符合宪法的解释。通过合宪性解释的途径，宪法的价值理念得以注入部门法的实践，从而使得部门法能更好地承担保护基本权利的义务。

关键词: 住宅自由, 入户抢劫, 基本权利

Abstract: The legal order based on the Constitution is a dynamic norm System, in which the meaning of the Superior norms is closely connected with that of the inferior ones. It is the duty of the State to protect the freedom of home, and the criminal norm proscribing u robbery with housebreaking is the implementation of the duty. The Supreme Court defines the term household in its judicial interpretation, which in turn demarcates the coverage of the freedom of home. By analyzing the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court and the judicial cases of inferior courts, this article finds that there are two different definitions of household. One of them defines it as places used for personal life, while the other defines it as places used for family life. It is the interpretation in conformity with the Constitution that the Interpreter should choose to follow. By the means of constitutionally faithful interpretation, the value and ideas of the Constitution can be implanted into the judicial application of Statutes, which in turn make them protect constitutional rights more effectively.

Key words: Freedom of Home, Robbery with Housebreaking, Constitutional Rights