摘要： 从“善的界说”和“正的界说”这一双重视角，来分析中国传统的话语空间和法律议论的结构性特色以及问题状况，可以找到“互惠正义”和“为了相互承认的论证”这些具有可比较性的切入点，从而发现进一步探讨中国经验并与关于法律推理的各种学说进行对话的可能性。以最高人民法院刚颁布不久的《关于加强和规范裁判文书释法说理的指导意见》为素材，来研究中国式法律解释策略、法律沟通方式的演变趋势以及有待改进的环节，将会有许多趣味盎然的现象有待理论阐述。

关键词: 法律议论, 相互承认, 法律推理, 法律解释, 解释共同体

Abstract: To analyse the structual charecteristics and problematic situation of the traditional discourse and legal argumentation in China，from the dual viewpoint of“conception of the good”and“conception of right or justice”，it is possible to find the startpoint of comparability in reciprocal justice and the demonstration for mutual recognition，and to explore the possibility of dialogue between Chinese experience and the theories on legal argumentation.Doing researches on the legal interpretative strategies with Chinese style，the developmental trend of the mode of legal communication and the weak link for improvement，with the newly issued guidance opinion of the Supreme Peoples Court on strenthening legal interpretation and legal reasoning for the material，we can find many interesting things for theoretical explanation.

Key words: Legal Argumentation, Mutual Recognition, Legal Reasoning, Legal Interpretation, Interpretive Community