法学家

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国刑法教义学:经验、反思与建构

王莹,法学博士,中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心副教授。   

  • 出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2020-05-14

 Chinese Criminal law Dogmatics:Experience,Reflection and Construction

Wang Ying,Ph.D. in Law,Associate Professor,Research Center for Criminal Science of Renmin University.   

  • Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-14

摘要:

当代中国刑法教义学经历了去政治化工具的教义学、作为解释学工具的教义学及作为学科精致化工具的教义学的发展节点。面临实定法的粗疏与缺陷,理论继受过程中的移植落差,中国刑法教义学的发展呈现出诸多特殊的面向。一方面是中国刑法实定法规定的非理性,另一方面是刑法教义学本身的高度理性,二者之间形成了持久的紧张关系,在这种紧张关系之中开展教义学研究需要厘清实定法不可质疑性前提与教义学科学性的关系、立法论与解释论的关系,培育连接立法-司法-法学研究者的教义学共同体,同时警惕对德日刑法教义学的过度路径依赖,积极进行本土化教义学理论的创新与构建。

关键词: 刑法教义学, 法律解释, 实定法否定禁令, 教义学共同体, 教义学本土化

Abstract:

The contemporary Chinese criminal law dogmatics has undergone the following development phases:dogmatics as de-politization instrument,as interpretation instrusment and as disciplinary refining instrument.Facing the deficient positive law in the legislation and the theoretical gaps during legal transplantation,the Chinese criminal law dogmatics has developed various characteristical aspects.There exists a lasting tension between the irrationality of regulations of the positive law and the extreme rationality of the dogmatics of criminal law.A sound dogmatics research in this tension should reflect the relationship between the premise of incontestability of positive law(Negationsverbot)and the scientific nature of dogmatics,the relationship between the legislation and hermeneutics,the relationship between the localization and the transplantation of German and Japanese criminal dogmatics.

Key words: Dogmatics of Criminal Law, Interpretation of Law, Negationsverbot, Dogmatic Professional Community, Localization of Dogmatics