摘要：

抓捕是一项身体技艺，其对侦查人员之资质的要求，在内容上与对法官的资质要求有所不同。由此切入来认识公安的内部构成和检警关系，便具有了不同的视域。在检察院的反贪反渎职能转隶后，由监察委负责抓捕的涉案人员之数量和构成发生了较大变化。从保障抓捕行动的技术需求出发，持枪权和法警、武警配合的问题亟待重新审视。由于抓捕总是处于具体的场域内，而在强制实施抓捕时武警的作用突出，故而武警在司法体制中的地位趋强。抓捕后将涉案人员带离现场和押解的行动有着丰富的细节，从而对于一些诉讼制度的构建具有基础性的决定意义。作为侦查行动技术的抓捕，对国家意志在刑事诉讼中的实现处于基底位置。但是，目的不能说明手段正当。以行动为导向的刑事诉讼法学研究，与从一个元叙事出发进行公理体系的理论推演，这两种方法具有知识互补性。

关键词: 刑事诉讼, 抓捕, 侦查技术, 身体技艺, 武警

Abstract:

Apprehension is a physical technique that commands from investigators competence and skills different from those of a judge.Such understanding casts a novel light on the study of internal organization of the police force and the relationship between police and prosecutorial authorities.In the wake of the structural transfer of anti-corruption authorities from the Procuratorate to the Supervisory Committee，suspects apprehended by the latter has seen major changes in number and composition.That in turn creates demands for new arrangements on a range of supporting mechanisms，such as allocating the authority to bear weapons and the marshal institutions.Because apprehension always takes place at concrete scenes and forceful apprehension depends heavily on the armed police force，the stature of the armed police force is poised to rise within the general judicial system.There are rich details in the actions involved in taking away and transporting an apprehended suspects from the crime scene，and these details are critical to the construction of a system of criminal procedure.Apprehension as an investigative technique therefore serves the basis of how the will of the state becomes manifested in criminal proceedings.Nonetheless，as ends alone do not justify means，it is important to study criminal procedures from both the action-oriented perspective and the meta-discourse based，axiomatic deductive perspective，which complement each other.

Key words: Criminal Procedure, Apprehension, Investigative Technique, Physical Technology, Armed Police Force