摘要： 依《物权法》第24条，特殊动产以交付为所有权变动要件，但未经登记不得对抗善意第三人。“善意第三人”，应仅指不知道或不应知道所有权在当事人之间发生了变动而对同一标的物享有物权的人；“不得对抗”，意谓未登记的特殊动产所有权人不享有可排斥该善意第三人权利或优先于其权利实现的法律地位。其中，第三人善意与否，应结合特殊动产的占有与登记两种公示外观具体判断。由此，第24条所包含的登记对抗效力问题，可以转化为无权处分中受让人的善意取得问题。如此作解，则未经登记的特殊动产所有权仍属完全所有权，只是在与信赖利益相冲突时应服从于法律对交易安全的保护。藉此，也可以简单化解登记对抗主义下法律适用的诸多解释难题。

关键词: 特殊动产, 交付生效, 登记对抗, 善意取得

Abstract: According to Article 24 of the Real Right Law, the ownership change of special movables takes effect through delivery, but may not challenge any bona fide third party if it is not registered.“Bona fide third party”refers to a person who does not know or should not be aware of the change in ownership between the parties and who claims the real right to the same subject matter.That the unregistered owner of special movables may not challenge any bona fide third party means that the owner does not have legal status to exclude the right of the third party or have precedence over its realization.Whether the third party is a bona fide one or not, should be specifically judged combined with possession and registration appearance of the special movables.Thus, the effectiveness of registration confrontation in Article 24 can be transformed into the problem concerning the bona fide acquisition of the assignee in the unauthorized disposition.According to such interpretation, the unregistered ownership of special movables, which should be subject to the protection of trade security by law when it is in conflict with reliance interest, is still the full ownership.Accordingly, many problems in the law application under the registration confrontation can be easily explained or solved.

Key words: Special Movables, Taking Effect through Delivery, Registration Confrontation, Bona Fide Acquisition