摘要： 非法证据排除的“例外模式”是对例外因素影响非法证据排除这一现象的理论归纳。现行重复供述排除规则具有“原则排除——例外不排除”的构造，但在司法适用中却存在缺陷，这与该规则的理论根据不清、排除的程序与标准不明有关。为此，在应当将该规则的理论根据定位为设置例外因素的理论根据，包括自愿性矫正理论、关联性阻断理论与可靠性保障理论。同时还应围绕例外因素构建重复供述排除的程序与标准，在认定先前供述的性质后，综合审查例外因素介入的合理性以及重复供述的合法性，并判断控方能否将此证明至特定标准，最终决定是否排除重复供述。

关键词: 重复供述, 非法证据排除, 例外模式, 法教义学

Abstract: Exceptional pattern is a theoretical induction of the phenomenon that exceptional factors affect the exclusion of illegal evidence, which is evident in the exclusion rule of repeated confessions.Although the current exclusion rule of repeated confession has the structure of“exclude in principle-unexclude in exception”, it has defects in the process of judicial application, which is related to the unclear theoretical basis of the rule and the unclear procedure and standard of exclusion of confession.Therefore, the dogmatics of repetitive confession exclusion rule should be based on the theory of setting exceptional factors, including voluntary correction theory, relevance interruption theory and reliability assurance theory.At the same time, we should construct the procedure and standard of excluding repeated confessions around exceptional factors.After confirming the nature of previous confessions, we should comprehensively review the rationality of the intervention of exceptional factors and the legitimacy of repeated confessions, and judge whether the prosecution can prove this to be a specific standard, and finally decide whether to exclude repeated confessions.After confirming the evidence ability of repeated confession, the authenticity of the statement can be strengthened to evaluate its weight of proof as a reference condition for eliminating repeated confession.

Key words: Repeated Confessions, Exclusion of Illegal Evidence, Exceptional pattern, Dogmatics of law