摘要：

“金融安全”虽非严格意义上的法律概念，但在我国法院的司法文件和司法裁判文书中一直被广泛使用，其原因在于：其一，法院需要确认自身作为国家整体政治（政权）架构中的重要组成部分；其二，法院正当化自由裁量权的行使；其三，为创制金融法律规则提供外部条件。由此，“金融安全”的话语表述成为了现实中的司法“润滑剂”，同时也一定程度上展示了我国金融司法的主要运行特征：首先，“金融安全”话语在某些场景中有可能弱化司法自由裁量权的外部约束；其次，除了涉及政策性的不良金融债权处置案件之外，“金融安全”话语现实中并不构成司法领域中“所有制歧视”的基础；最后，“金融安全”话语持续扮演着公共政策向司法政策转化过程中“桥梁”的角色，但也埋下了以司法稳定性为代价的隐忧。

关键词: 金融安全, 金融监管, 金融争议, 司法行为, 司法改革

Abstract:

Although“financial security”is not a legal concept in the strict sense，it has been widely used in judicial documents and judicial adjudications of Chinese courts.The reasons are as follows：First，the courts need to confirm that they are in the overall political(power)structure of the country.Secondly，the court justifies the exercise of discretion；thirdly，it provides external conditions for creating financial legal rules.As a result，the discourse expression of“financial security”has become a judicial“lubricant”，and it has also demonstrated the main characteristics of China's financial judiciary to a certain extent.First，the“financial security”discourse in some scenarios may weaken the external constraints on judicial discretion；secondly，except for cases involving the disposition of non-performing financial claims，the discourse of“financial security”does not actually constitute the basis of“discrimination of ownership”throughout the judiciary；finally，“financial security”discourse continues to play the role of“bridge”in the transition from public policy to judicial policy，but it also lays hidden concerns at the expense of judicial stability.

Key words: Financial Security, Financial Regulation, Financial Dispute, Judicial Behavior, Judicial Reform