摘要： 2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改，有关辩护律师核实证据的内容、范围和方式等均不明确，随着《刑法修正案(九)》的实施，律师核实证据还将面临“泄露案件信息”的执业风险。基于价值考量，核实证据内容应限定为客观上矛盾、主观上“存疑”的证据而非全案证据；核实范围上，在确认律师有权对言词证据进行核实的同时，应设置若干例外，并根据不同的诉讼阶段确定不同的核实范围，办案机关可针对个案以“负面清单”形式禁止律师对某些敏感信息进行披露；在核实方式上不宜作出硬性规定，但应注意区分被追诉人是否被羁押的情形，对于未被羁押的，可予以适当限制。此外，尚需完善配套制度：修订律师执业行为规范；确立违法监听排除规则；赋予律师侦查阶段有限的核实证据权。

关键词: 辩护律师, 核实证据, 内容, 范围, 方式

Abstract: The Amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 doesn't define the contents, range of and approaches to the verification of evidence by defense lawyers.With the enforcement of the Amendment(IX)of the Criminal Law, it is faced with the professional risk of“divulging case information”.Considering the balance between values, the contents of evidence verification should be limited to the objectively contradictory or subjectively doubtful evidence.The range of evidence verification should be governed by a general principle that defense lawyers have the right to verify testimonies with certain exceptions.The ranges of evidence verification should vary at different stages of the procedure.Agencies handling a case can list the information forbidden to be divulged by defense lawyers.It is not proper to define concrete approaches to evidence verification which should be different when applied to the accused in custody and the accused not in custody.What should be improved are ethical rules, the rule to exclude illegal monitoring evidence.Limited right to verify evidence during the investigation stage should be granted to defense lawyers.

Key words: Defense Lawyer, Verification of Evidence, Contents, Range, Approaches