摘要： 我国通说与司法实践将交付作为特殊动产善意取得的公示要件。然而,交付生效排斥将登记作为善意取得要件,也与登记对抗制度的宗旨相矛盾。从交付生效的立场出发,特殊动产的物权表征方式应为占有,但这同样会引发物权表征方式选择正当性的争论。对于船舶,卖据签署并非交付或交付的替代,意思主义更能适应船舶买卖标准合同对于所有权移转时间的安排。对于航空器,除适应交易实践外,国际公约也为采纳意思主义提供了正当性。在意思主义下理解登记对抗,可依公信力说,将其看作登记公信力的具体适用,统一以信赖原理为支撑。

关键词: 特殊动产, 善意取得, 登记对抗, 意思主义, 登记公信力

Abstract: The general theory and judicial practice regard delivery as the effective publicity requirement for the bona fide acquisition of special movables.However, the publicity requirement excludes the simultaneous use of registration as a condition for bona fide acquisition, which in turn contradicts the purpose of registration confrontation.From the standpoint of delivery effectiveness, the method of representing property rights for special movables should be possession, with registration only affecting the transferee's behavior at the level of empirical facts.This, however, also sparks a debate on the legitimacy of choosing the method of property rights representation.For ships, the doctrine of intent is more adaptable to the timing arrangements for the transfer of ownership in standard contracts and bill of sale in ship trading practices.For aircraft, in addition to adapting to trading practices, international conventions also provide legitimacy for the doctrine of intent.Understanding the registration opposition under the doctrine of intent can be based on the doctrine of credibility, viewing it as a specific application of the credibility of registration, uniformly supported by the principle of reliance.

Key words: Special Movables, bona fide Acquisition, Registration Confrontation, Doctrine of Intent, Credibility of Registration